Following the IPL and Twenty20 World Cup it is great to have Test cricket back on the agenda. If the 2009 Ashes series can come close to the 2005 series in England in terms of competitiveness and pure excitement we will be in for a real treat. Of course in 2005 England regained the famous urn for the first time since 1985-86 only to have this compliment returned in 2006-2007 in Australia where Australia put the demons of 2005 to rest in emphatic fashion winning the series 5 – nil.
So the stage is set, however the landscape has changed significantly for Australia since 2006-2007, no longer does Australia have it’s host of champions to turn to, gone from the last Ashes series are some of the greats of the game – Warne, McGrath, Gilchrist, Hayden and Langer. Experienced performers like these not only control through the brilliance of their performances they also inspire their less experienced team mates with confidence and the self-belief that comes with knowing how to win. They will be missed.
However despite the significant loss of such vast experience in a short time frame there is still plenty to like about this younger and aggressive Australian team including a strong if not settled batting line-up and a good pace bowling attack and team.
Although perhaps not producing the big scores that we have become accustomed to recently, my former Tasmanian teammate, Ricky Ponting is the premier batsman in the world and is to be underestimated at your peril. While I wouldn’t say that he needs runs, he will need to lead from the front with the bat and his contribution will be very significant for Australia. Simon Katich – Australia’s rock fought his way back into a baggy green through sheer weight of runs after losing his Cricket Australia contract for several seasons and can now be rightly ranked among the top batsmen in Test matches over the last 2 seasons. After starting Test cricket as a highly entertaining batsman Michael Clarke, through lots of hard work and careful thought now holds his wicket very dearly. With greater precision in his shot selection, a greater emphasis on meeting the ball with the full face of the bat and a more stable hitting and head position, he has transformed himself to a bankable test batsman of the highest quality.
Mike Hussey’s Bradman-like test batting average has come back to the field somewhat lately (now in the 50’s!). Complaining of staleness (an argument that doesn’t get much truck with most 9 to 5 ers) Hussey should be well rested and hopefully able to reach the standards of excellence we have come to expect from him. This is a big series for Hussey and he needs runs to avoid further questions about his place so he won’t lack for motivation. Philip Hughes has hit the ground running in international cricket and has youth and momentum on his side and it will be very interesting how the English respond to our newest batting star. Hughes aggression at the top of the order, in the Michael Slater style, is certainly not typical of an opener. His penchant for creating room on the back foot to slice his cut shot away behind point from the line of off-stump makes him hard to pin down as the South Africans found out. However this also provides a technical weakness that the English can exploit – whether they can or not is one of the big questions of the series. After a mixed start to test cricket Brad Haddin has grabbed his chance and is a fantastic, attacking option with the bat for Australia.
The real worry for Australia is the number 6 position and it appears that 3 candidates McDonald, Watson and North will contest this position. My firm belief is that no 6 is a specialist batting position and requires century making capability from the incumbent. On this count I would rule out Andrew McDonald for Test match cricket, although clearly he is a very a handy and competitive cricketer. Shane Watson has an excellent batting record at 1st class level but he is dogged by injuries and is yet to post a commanding performance in Test cricket with the bat and he must be running out of opportunities. My preference for no 6 would be Marcus North, he grabbed his chance in South Africa and is a highly competent and experienced player.
Australia’s pace bowling stocks are strong and the inclusion of Brett Lee and Stuart Clark will increase the depth of the squad and competition for places in the starting XI. Mitchell Johnson is perhaps the form pace bowler in the world at the moment and is at the peak of his game, with the worry for England being that he is starting to swing the ball. Peter Siddle is fast, aggressive and has grabbed his chance with both hands and must start. The third and fourth pace bowling spots in the test XII will be contested by Clark, Lee and Hilfenhaus and the selectors will have to think long and hard about this. I’d opt for Clark’s metronomic accuracy and steepling bounce and the swing and pace of Hilfenhaus. So, that leaves Lee out of the XII for the first test and this selection dilemma is a good problem to have. Champions like Lee cannot be written offer and it’s possible he will influence the series at some point.
Like the No 6 batting spot, the spinning spot is a worry for Australia with the significant difference being there are 3 candidates for the batting position and only Nathan Hauritz for the spinning spot. Like McDonald, Hauritz is a very good competitive player who has posted some strong one-day performances recently but is not an option for Test match cricket. Hauritz’s bowling is more effective in one-day matches where the batsmen are compelled to go after him, in Test and 1st class cricket where the onus is an the bowler to prize the batsman out, he is not effective unless conditions are favouring spin. Hauritz will be in the first Test XII as the only specialist spinner in the party but will have little impact on the series unless the wickets are raging turners.
The lack of a genuine Test match spinner is brought about by generational change that led to the retirement of Shane Warne and Stuart MacGill and the extremely poor handling of Australia’s next generation of spin bowlers. I believe that you can’t get into too much trouble if you stick to the basics, for example what’s wrong with the idea of identifying Australia’s best spinner and providing opportunities and support at the selection table? The revolving door antics of the Australian selection panel reflect that they are yet to even identify whom the best spinner is, let alone provide them with any support. Following in the footsteps of Shane Warne – one of the greatest players to ever play the game – was always going to be a hard act to follow and perhaps it is an impossible task, however by discarding spin bowlers (Casson, Krejza and McGain) after one or two opportunities is never going to develop a spin bowler and sends the message to the players that if you don’t perform – you’re out! What is perplexing about this is Jason Krejza took 12 wickets on debut, played one more Test and then was dropped. If Shane Warne was treated the same way after his first test, the history of Australian cricket 1991-2007 might look a lot different! Furthermore, now that the selectors seem to be sticking with a spinner in Hauritz, they seem to have backed the wrong horse as to my mind bowling spin or otherwise is about taking wickets, not containment and nothing contains like taking wickets anyway! It seems the selectors have chosen the bowler least likely to do this in comparison with the other candidates in Krejza and McGain.
Australia aren’t the cricketing superpower they once were but they are still a very, very good cricket team – perhaps the best Test match team in the world – they aren’t perfect but these imperfections possibly make them a more watchable team. Whatever your thoughts, it’s great to have the 5 day game back and should be a great series. Enjoy!
Cheers
Mark